Skip to main content
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site, you consent to the use of these cookies.
OK

For US Healthcare Professionals Only

Flow Cytometry in CTCL

What is flow cytometry?

Flow cytometry is a tool that analyzes cells by measuring light scatter of fluorescently labeled cells.1

Cells are tagged with fluorescent markers of interest and suspended in solution

Fluorescent cells are injected into the flow cytometer and evaluated as they flow past multiple lasers

Each cell is analyzed for visible light scatter and multiple fluorescence parameters

Light scatter information is collected and processed by a computer

Computer-generated output provides basis for diagnosis; report contains data on abnormal T-cell populations

A reliable method for measuring abnormal T-cells in blood

Flow cytometry is the preferred method for measuring blood involvement in Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome.2 It provides qualitative and quantitative measures of abnormal T-cells in blood (eg, immunophenotype, T-cell ratios).3,4

Robust5

Quantifiable6

Objective6

Consistent7

Increasingly used6

Technologically precise8-9

Illustration of  cells passing one by one through lasers, creating light scatter that will be analyzed.

NCCN, EORTC, and International Guidelines for Cutaneous Lymphoma (ISCL) recommend the use of flow cytometry for evaluation of CTCL stage2,10

Until recently, the assessment of blood involvement was made using manual counts of morphologically atypical T-cells (Sézary cells). But this approach is subjective, time consuming, and affected by interobserver variability.6

Illustration of a microscope revealing Sézary cells.

International guidelines recommend a minimum of 6 panel markers11

No single T-cell marker alone can accurately identify Sézary cells. Diagnosis is highly dependent on evaluation of multiple T-cell markers combined in a single-tube flow cytometry assay.11

Identification of leukocytes and T-cells
CD45 Identifies all leukocytes
CD3 Identifies all T-cells
CD4, CD8 Identifies T-cell subsets
Ratio of CD4:CD8 can provide additional important information
Detection of Sézary cells
CD7, CD26 Frequently absent in Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome

Loss of CD7 and/or CD26 are common T-cell abnormalities in Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome. Loss of CD7 is identified in 50% to 80% and loss of CD26 is identified in 70% to 100% of cases with blood involvement.6,11

CD4+/CD7- and/or CD4+/CD26- are common phenotypes seen in Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome5,11

When to consider flow cytometry

Recently published consensus guidance from an international group of cytometry experts recommend flow cytometry at diagnosis and throughout treatment when clinical flags appear. Flow cytometry may also be considered during follow-up.6

Consensus recommendations on when to consider flow cytometry6

At diagnosis

Flow cytometry can aid in:

  • Accurate diagnosis, staging, and informing prognosis
  • Establishing baseline for monitoring changes in blood burden over time
  • Guiding treatment approach

When the following clinical flags appear

  • In the case of disease/stage progression
  • Patients with advanced disease (stage IIB and above)
  • Intractable pruritus
  • Generalized patches and/or plaques (T2A/T2B)
  • Erythroderma
  • Lymphocytosis on WBC
  • High serum LDH
  • Lack of response to treatment

How often during follow-up?7

  • Every 3 months in patients with abnormal flow cytometry at baseline
  • Upon development of any clinical flags

The flow report will provide an interpretation of the results with a clinical interpretation, and typically also includes a breakdown of percentages and quantities of lymphocyte types.3,8 Additional information included in the report may vary by institution.8,11

Key components included in a flow cytometry report3

Patient information and treatment history

Includes information provided by the HCP in the flow request.

  • Patient ID
  • Current diagnosis
  • Current treatment(s)
  • Clinical history
  • Assay objective (eg, Suspicion of Mycosis Fungoides. Rule out CTCL)

Clinical interpretation of results (negative/positive)

Will appear in the beginning portion of the report, and will include interpretation of the results specifying whether the results were consistent with CTCL. B-classification may also be specified.

What may be included in the clinical interpretation3

  1. Presence or absence of abnormal T-cells based on visual interpretation of the flow data
  2. Description of the abnormal population if present, including phenotype
  3. Relative percentage of abnormal T-cells

Example of a negative flow result

No distinct population of abnormal T-cells is detected. No expanded CD4+ T-cell population is detected. CD4:CD8 ratio is 3:1. T-cells with CD4+/CD7- immunophenotype are 3.0% of all analyzed cells and 10.0% of lymphocytes, and have a heterogenous CD7 expression pattern. No other significant T-cell immunophenotypic abnormalities are detected.

Example of a positive flow result

Atypical T-cell population consistent with peripheral blood involvement. Immunophenotype: variable CD2, dim CD3, CD4+ and CD7-. T-cell gene rearrangement analysis: positive for clonal rearrangements in TCR-gamma and TCR-beta.
B2 classification + TCR clone

Quantitative T-cell panel

Absolute counts and percentages of T-cell tested. May include other information such as CD4:CD8 ratio. CD4+/CD7- and CD4+/CD26- results may be highlighted.

Quantitative T-cell panel results may be presented in table format:

Absolute counts

May include a column that lists the # cells/unit volume (eg, 4.30 K/µL)

% of total lymphocytes

This column would list the percentage of each marker expressed relative to the total T-cell population (eg, 71% of total lymphocytes)

CD3

cells/µL

%

CD4

cells/µL

%

CD7

cells/µL

%

CD8

cells/µL

%

CD45

cells/µL

%

CD4+/CD7-

cells/µL

%

CD4+/CD26-

cells/µL

%

Summary: Flow cytometry matters

Why

Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome are lymphomas that present in skin12

Blood involvement can develop at any stage and is associated with shorter survival10,13,14

Blood must be assessed for accurate diagnosing and optimal patient management6,10

When

  • At diagnosis for accurate staging, and guiding treatment approach6
  • Every 3 months if there is blood involvement2
  • Upon disease progression
  • Advanced disease (stage IIB and above)
  • Intractable pruritus
  • Generalized patches/plaques (T2A/T2B)
  • Erythroderma
  • Abnormal lab results
  • Extracutaneous disease
  • Refractory to treatment

How

Using flow cytometry to measure a minimum of 6 panel markers; no single antigen by itself can accurately diagnose Mycosis Fungoides or Sézary Syndrome11

Recommended T-cell panel for Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome11

CD3CD8

CD4CD26

CD7CD45

Watch expert perspectives on flow cytometry

Alejandro A. Gru, MD, Leonard C. Harber Professor of Dermatology and Director of Dermatopathology; Columbia University Irving Medical Center discusses why flow cytometry is the recommended method for assessing blood involvement in Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome. Dr. Gru explores how flow cytometry works, recommended panel markers, the flow report, and when to consider flow cytometry.

References: 1. McKinnon KA. Flow cytometry: an overview. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2018;120:5.1.1-5.1.11. 2. Olsen EA, Whittaker S, Willemze R, et al. Primary cutaneous lymphoma: recommendations for clinical trial design and staging update from the ISCL, USCLC, and EORTC. Blood. 2022;140:419-437. 3. Illingworth A, Johansson U, Huang S, et al. International guidelines for the flow cytometric evaluation of peripheral blood for suspected Sézary syndrome or mycosis fungoides: assay development/optimization, validation, and ongoing quality monitors. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2021;100(2):156-182. 4. Craig F. It is time to adopt a multicolor immunophenotyping approach to evaluate blood for Sézary syndrome and mycosis fungoides. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2021;100(2):125-128. 5. Tembhare PR, Chatterjee G, Chaturvedi C, et al. Critical role of flow cytometric immunophenotyping in the diagnosis, subtyping, and staging of T/NK-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in real-world practice: A study of 232 cases from a tertiary cancer center in India. Front Onc. 2022;12:doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.779230. 6. Vermeer MH, Moins-Teisserenc H, Bagot M, et al. Flow cytometry for the assessment of blood tumour burden in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: towards a standardized approach. Br J Dermatol. 2022;187(1):21-28. 7. Vermeer MH, Nicolay JP, Scarisbrick JJ, Zinzani PL. The importance of assessing blood tumour burden in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Br J Dermatol. 2021;185(1):19-25. 8. Guitart J. Sézary syndrome and mycosis fungoides flow cytometric evaluation: the clinicians’ perspective. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2021;100 (2):129-131. 9. Craig FE, Foon KA. Flow cytometric immunophenotyping for hematologic neoplasms. Blood. 2008; 111(8):3941-3967. 10. Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Primary Cutaneous Lymphomas V.1.2023. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2023. All rights reserved. Accessed March 5, 2023. To view the most recent and complete version of the guideline, go online to NCCN.org. 11. Horna P, et al. Flow cytometric evaluation of peripheral blood for suspected Sézary syndrome or mycosis fungoides: international guidelines for assay characteristics. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2021;100(2):142-155. 12. Willemze R, Cerroni L, Kempf W, et al. The 2018 update of the WHO-EORTC classification for primary cutaneous lymphomas. Blood. 2019;133(16):1703-1714. 13. Agar NS, Wedgeworth E, Crichton S, et al. Survival outcomes and prognostic factors in mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome: validation of the revised International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer staging proposal. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(31):4730-4739. 14. Talpur R, Singh L, Daulat S, et al. Long-term outcomes of 1,263 patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome from 1982 to 2009. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(18):5051-5060.